Sharing the microphone with Scott Ritter on Press TV (Iran)
It was a pleasure yesterday evening to join celebrated analyst and critic of the Ukraine War Scott Ritter on a Press TV “News Review” program commenting on the latest U.S. arms deliveries to Kiev. The link to this broadcast is here:
Ukraine’s Zelensky says first batch of US Abrams tanks has arrived
|
I freely acknowledge that the expert evaluation of U.S. military supplies which I brought to the table was given me by professional panelists appearing on the Russian state television program Sixty Minutes earlier in the day. The point is that the various elements in the mix of materiel being delivered to Kiev amount to contradictory signals on how the Pentagon reads the situation on the ground and, in particular, whether Ukraine is out of necessity about to change its posture from offense to defense.
The Abrams tanks would have been a major asset in an offensive posture had they come much earlier in the conflict and had the Russians not built the formidable “Surovikin” defense lines making grouped tank assault on their positions impossible. Coming as they do now, the Abrams tanks, all 31 of them, represent rhetorical support to Kiev, checking of the box of what had been promised, without any regard for the practical effect on the course of the war. The White House and Pentagon are only considering what to say to the broad American public after the Ukrainians are properly defeated.
On the other hand, the ATACMS 300 km-range missiles equipped with cluster bomb as opposed to unitary warheads are being shipped to Ukraine precisely in anticipation of the conclusion of the ongoing, failed offensive campaign and switch-over by the Ukrainians to a defense: as the Russians push them back to the West, these ATACMS will serve to continue bombing residential neighborhoods in the Donbas from distances much further away than today. They could be useful against waves of Russian infantry charging Ukrainian positions across open fields, but it is hardly likely the Russian command would repeat this kind of folly which the Ukrainians have committed in the last three months of their “counter-offensive.” Instead, using their superior air force, in particular the multifunctional “Alligator” helicopters and Lancet attack drones, the Russians may be expected to hunt and destroy both Ukrainian artillery pieces and HIMARS/ATACMS launchers in the field before their infantry advance.
There is no reason to be surprised that Washington is placing its bets on appearances rather than on realities as it pursues its assistance to the Ukraine war effort. The United States was once known to be results-oriented, pragmatic. No more: it is ideologues who call the shots in the corridors of power.
©Gilbert Doctorow, 2023